In a sport long held up as a national treasure, Ethiopian track and field now faces a disquieting wave of public scrutiny. As the country readies its youth delegation for the African U18 and U20 Championships in Nigeria this July, what should have been a routine announcement has instead set off a chain reaction of public doubt, introspection, and skepticism. Following the Ethiopian Athletics Federation’s disclosure that fewer than one-third of its athletes passed age verification screenings, the reaction online has not been one of mere disappointment. It has bordered on disillusionment.
The crux of the public response has little to do with administrative diligence or procedural change. Instead, it hinges on something more unsettling. If over 70% of the selected youth athletes were found ineligible based on age, what does that imply about those who have come before? Within hours of the news surfacing, Ethiopian track and field fans and athletics observers began questioning not only the current screening process but also the legitimacy of past youth records, medals, and team selections.
The data released was unambiguous. From 76 athletes tested, only 22 were cleared. Among male athletes, the numbers were especially stark. None in the U18 division met eligibility standards, and only four from U20 did. Female athletes fared better, with 16 passing overall, nine of whom had initially been registered in a younger age category. The Ethiopian Athletics Federation has stated that these screenings involved MRI scans, likely to determine skeletal maturity, a method often used in age-sensitive competitions. However, the lack of published methodology or external oversight has left many fans unsatisfied. In a nation where athletics has served as both pastime and pride, the absence of clarity is being taken personally.
In principle, the Federation’s emphasis on integrity ought to be welcomed. Age fraud, especially in youth divisions, is a long-standing issue across global sport. The decision to implement stricter age checks mirrors international best practices and demonstrates institutional intent to reform. Yet, the sheer magnitude of disqualifications has shifted the conversation away from policy and toward suspicion. The Federation has not yet addressed how these discrepancies occurred in the first place, or whether prior national team selections were subject to comparable standards.
The Ethiopian Athletics Federation conducted age verification, including MRI scans, for athletes set to compete at the African U18 & U20 Championships in Nigeria in July.
Out of 76 athletes screened, only 22 were cleared to compete:
6 male athletes
16 female athletes… pic.twitter.com/jOpYyce7DE
— Track & Field Gazette (@TrackGazette) June 28, 2025
What was meant to reinforce trust has, in some circles, deepened mistrust. If these measures are to become a new standard, and not simply an exceptional episode, the Ethiopian Athletics Federation must confront a difficult but necessary reckoning. Transparency is not merely procedural, it is reputational. And quite expectedly, fans online were buzzing.
Fans left shaken as age scandal rocks Ethiopian athletics legacy
As soon as the news became viral, fans flocked to the comments section. The integrity of Ethiopia’s past youth achievements is under fire, as one fan remarked, “Makes you wonder how many of their distance results from years prior were not valid.” With 70% of current prospects disqualified, this isn’t idle speculation. It hints at a systemic issue that may have tainted medals, records, and reputations once celebrated as national glory.
In defense, another user pointed out, “Very few. Ethiopia has been running these tests and they decided to make the results public…” This signals a proactive shift by the Federation, owning the narrative before global bodies penalize them. The transparency may be new, but the internal checks, according to this perspective, have existed longer than assumed.
One comment from another track and field enthusiast sarcastically quipped, “How does the MRI help … do the officials count the rings on your leg muscles? LOL”, mocking both the process and the Federation’s opacity. Despite using MRIs to gauge skeletal maturity, the Federation hasn’t clarified protocols, creating confusion and public disbelief about the tests’ scientific legitimacy.
A Jamaican fan’s take, “And when we talk about the African athletes coming into the Jamaican schoolboy system…” broadens the issue beyond Ethiopia. It implies that loopholes in age verification impact fairness even in regional systems like Jamaica’s ISSA, hinting at a deeper, pan-African problem.
The next comment, “The African in me hates to say this but… we gonna have to test the entire continent…” frames the scandal as emblematic of broader regional patterns. With Ethiopia’s elite pipeline under question, the fan proposes continent-wide scrutiny, suggesting trust has eroded well beyond national borders.
The final pointer echoes collective anxiety: “Fans flocked to the comments section.” This isn’t typical online outrage, rather, it’s the sound of a shaken community. What was meant to reinforce credibility has exposed fractures in Ethiopia’s track and field legacy, sparking fears that the rot runs deeper than one age group or one federation. Thus, with the situation looking grim, it remains to be seen what happens next.
The post Track and Field Community Shaken as Age Scans Trigger Alarming Questions Over Eligibility and Past Results appeared first on EssentiallySports.