Is the traditional college football spring game on its deathbed? A seismic shift is rocking the offseason, where the chaos of college football spring practices is overshadowing even the NFL Draft. Nebraska, USC, Texas, and Ohio State are leading a charge away from the familiar, citing player poaching and tampering issues. Meanwhile, Deion Sanders throws a curveball, proposing a radical new NCAA rule-bending idea for inter-team spring scrimmages, not intra-squad ones. Amidst this upheaval, Georgia Bulldogs and Kirby Smart are stuck in a bit of a pickle. They’re trying to figure out how to keep the good ol’ G-Day vibe alive while everyone else is playing by a whole new rulebook.
Now, just days into spring practice, Kirby Smart’s concerns are palpable. As Bulldogs insider Ryan Kerley observes, “It seems he’s worried about the depth, and he seems he’s worried about injuries. But he’s not worried about getting injured in that game.” While Smart downplays injury risks in the game itself, the cumulative impact of current injuries is undeniably affecting the team’s depth.
The Bulldogs are grappling with a growing list of sidelined players: WR Tyler Williams, Daylen Everette recovering from ankle and sports hernia surgery, Ryan Montgomery rehabbing an ACL repair, and Rod Robinson dealing with an ankle recovery. This mounting injury toll understandably raises Smart’s anxieties about the team’s depth during spring practice. But the injury concerns are just one facet of the complex picture surrounding Georgia’s spring showcase.
Georgia’s famed G-Day, traditionally a televised event, is undergoing a significant transformation. Scheduled for April 12th, this year’s G-Day will not be broadcast, denying fans unable to attend in person any online viewing access. Instead, the Bulldogs are opting for behind-the-scenes programming, rendering their spring showcase more exclusive. As Kirby Smart explains, “I want to have G-Day. But again we went through practice four, so practice one I couldn’t say with certainty we were going to have it. Through practice four, I still feel good about it.”
The G-Day scheduling issue transcends a mere logistical problem; it’s a matter of control. Smart and Georgia desire autonomy over their game’s timing, free from the constraints of television broadcast slots. “In terms of TV, I think it was more about being controlled on what time and in terms of we like to have recruits there. We like to have prospects come in. It’s a big event. We have official visits, so we want to control the timing of it more, and we want to be able to play at our pace and not have to worry about the constraints of being inside a window,” Smart elaborates.
While Smart emphasizes scheduling and recruiting, there’s an undeniable undercurrent of strategic caution. Minimizing televised exposure also serves to shield potential transfer candidates from the prying eyes of rival programs, mirroring the actions of Matt Rhule and Lincoln Riley. This move signals a growing trend of teams prioritizing internal control and strategic concealment.
Matt Rhule and Lincoln Riley’s game plan is out in the open now
Lane Kiffin, in Austin, was a pioneer in challenging the traditional spring game format. His innovative approach ignited a trend that has seen other college football powerhouses follow suit. Lincoln Riley, at USC, has recently embraced this shift. Rather than outright canceling their spring game, like Nebraska, Ohio State, and Texas, the Trojans opted for a rebranded event, “Salute to Troy.” This alteration, while presented as a fan-centric celebration, is also a calculated move to mitigate risks.
The specter of tampering looms large, potentially influencing Riley’s decision to deviate from the traditional format. However, as insider Ryan points out, “With the USC source saying the risk of injury. These guys get injured in practice all the time. They get injured in practice more than in the games, and the spring game counts as one of the 15 spring practices. And a couple of the other 15 spring practices are other scrimmages, so I don’t really view the injury risk as something significant.” The assertion that injury concerns are the primary driver for these changes rings hollow. After all, “injuries happen in practice all the time, so using that as an excuse to ditch a spring game just doesn’t add up.”
Then there’s Matt Rhule’s Nebraska, the catalyst for the “cancel spring game” movement. It’s clear that the spring game, traditionally a public showcase, is perceived as a prime opportunity for rival teams to identify and target potential transfer players. Rhule, like others, seeks to minimize this exposure. “I understand that reasoning. That’s going to happen either way. These coaches are tapped in. They know what’s going on around the country. But yeah, the spring game is a showcase. But like I said, the spring game is more of a showcase for the fans than anything else,” Ryan Kerley says. The spring game, in essence, is a public exhibition, and the fear of losing players is a growing anxiety.
Seems like the depth issues facing Kirby Smart and the G-Day dilemma reflect a broader trend in college football. It’s less about the fans now and more about keeping their star players under wraps and their strategies close to the vest. Will the spring game survive this makeover?
The post Georgia Reporter Clears Kirby Smart’s Spring Game Dilemma Stance as Lincoln Riley & Matt Rhule’s Agenda Exposed appeared first on EssentiallySports.